Μετά από το βιντεάκι με το ανοιχτό μικρόφωνο του Τραμπ, στο οποίο «συνελήφθη» να μιλάει άκρως σεξιστικά για τις γυναίκες, και να αναφέρει πως μπορεί να τις… χουφτώνει σε διάφορα σημεία, το διαδίκτυο, και δη το Reddit υπέρ του Trump κυκλοφόρησε και βίντεο με τον Μπιλ Κλίντον να κάνει ακριβώς αυτό, κατά τη διάρκεια της προεκλογικής του καμπάνιας με τον Αl Gore.
Στο βίντεο διαφαίνεται ξεκάθαρα ο Μπιλ να χουφτώνει την αεροσυνοδό κάτω από τη φούστα της για μερικά δεύτερα, μέχρι τη στιγμή που ο ίδιος καταλαβαίνει πως η κάμερα «γράφει», όπου και αποσύρει το χέρι του.
ΔΕΙΤΕ ΤΟ:
Oλόκληρη η χριστιανική ομογένεια της Αμερικής πρέπει τον Νοέμβρη να την καταψηφίσει…
ΕΝΑ ΑΠΟΚΑΛΥΠΤΙΚΟ ΒΙΝΤΕΟ ΠΟΥ ΑΠΟΔΕΙΚΝΥΕΙ ΠΟΙΟΙ ΚΑΤΑΣΚΕΥΑΣΑΝ ΤΑ »ΤΕΡΑΤΑ» ΤΩΝ ΙΣΛΑΜΟΦΑΣΙΣΤΩΝ
ΔΕΙΤΕ ΤΟΥΣ ΛΟΓΟΥΣ ΠΟΥ ΠΡΕΠΕΙ ΝΑ ΤΗΝ ΜΑΥΡΙΣΕΤΕ, Ε Δ Ω & Ε Δ Ω
Blog: "elamefora" 
Syrians are dying for Hillary Clinton
Posted on October 9, 2016 by martyrashrakat
Syrians are dying for Hillary Clinton, by Uncle Vania
Lieutenant General Stephen Townsend, new commander of US forces in Iraq and Syria, made the statement on the expansion of special forces that indicates belated coalition attempts to cover their July and August failures arising as a result of “blind-bombing”. These strikes claimed lives of hundreds of civilians. That’s why now there is a strong need to use special forces for more detailed reconnaissance and precision strikes.
The reason for the haste in which the American forces attack (and continue to do it) is the desire of Barack Obama to bring military personnel to perform only political tasks. As in the case of unsuccessful capture of Raqqa, the increase of bombing has only one purpose – to show voters before the presidential election that the international coalition is better than the Russian armed forces, and Obama is still at the helm. Everything is being done for the victory of Hillary Clinton in the presidential election. It will stop as soon as she is elected (or not elected). So now Obama urgently needs any victory (and it doesn’t matter what kind of victories) in order to show the Americans that billions of taxpayer dollars are not thrown away.
However, there is no effectiveness from such haste. On the contrary, more and more innocent Syrians are being killed.
So, in August a lot of people from Gandura, Tujan al-Kubra and other settlements of es-Saur (province of al-Raqqah) and Abu Kamal (province of Deir AZ-Zaur) were seriously injured and or killed because of such “blind-bombing”. Each time about 40 – 60 people were killed, as, for example, in Gandure or Tuhan al-Kubra.
Russian aircraft are often blamed for this. Such “collateral damage” is very often hushed up. That leads not only to the impunity for the Americans but to the increase of “blind” air strikes. This also leads to an increasing number of victims among the civilian population.
Weekly aimless bombing kills several hundreds of Syrian civilians. Given this, Americans have also got hundreds of Kurdish militias and Arabs from the moderate armed opposition groups involved in a strategically self-defeating, but politically useful for Obama assault on Raqqa. It seems that U.S. wants to turn Syria into a scorched desert without any population.
Another reason for inefficiency of American aviation is wide use of intelligence information of the opposition. They intentionally mislead their allies to get square with the Shiites, Alawites and other representatives of different groups and clans that do not support the “Syrian Democratic Forces”. Hence, there is some increase in number of civilian victims, including in Aleppo and other areas of Western and North-Western parts of the country where Shi’ites and Alawites (the religious opponents of fanatical Sunnis) live. Many of the Sunnis have now left the unpopular “Islamic State”, joined the ranks of the “Democratic Forces”, and continued their “Jihad” from there.
Only the collection of facts about the crimes of American international coalition can reduce the list of victims and force foreigners to treat the Syrians with respect and not as “cannon fodder” or “collateral damage”.
Featured image: The U.S is painting their F/A-18’s to match the paint schemes of Russian jets in Syria. Scott
Μου αρέσει!Αρέσει σε 1 άτομο
Hillary Clinton and the Syrian Bloodbath
02/14/2016 08:41 am ET | Updated Feb 15, 2016
2.6k
Jeffrey Sachs
Director, Center for Sustainable Development and Sustainable Development Solutions Network
TASOS KATOPODIS VIA GETTY IMAGES
In the Milwaukee debate, Hillary Clinton took pride in her role in a recent UN Security Council resolution on a Syrian ceasefire:
But I would add this. You know, the Security Council finally got around to adopting a resolution. At the core of that resolution is an agreement I negotiated in June of 2012 in Geneva, which set forth a cease-fire and moving toward a political resolution, trying to bring the parties at stake in Syria together.
This is the kind of compulsive misrepresentation that makes Clinton unfit to be President. Clinton’s role in Syria has been to help instigate and prolong the Syrian bloodbath, not to bring it to a close.
In 2012, Clinton was the obstacle, not the solution, to a ceasefire being negotiated by UN Special Envoy Kofi Annan. It was US intransigence – Clinton’s intransigence – that led to the failure of Annan’s peace efforts in the spring of 2012, a point well known among diplomats. Despite Clinton’s insinuation in the Milwaukee debate, there was (of course) no 2012 ceasefire, only escalating carnage. Clinton bears heavy responsibility for that carnage, which has by now displaced more than 10 million Syrians and left more than 250,000 dead.
As every knowledgeable observer understands, the Syrian War is not mostly about Bashar al-Assad, or even about Syria itself. It is mostly a proxy war, about Iran. And the bloodbath is doubly tragic and misguided for that reason.
Saudi Arabia and Turkey, the leading Sunni powers in the Middle East, view Iran, the leading Shia power, as a regional rival for power and influence. Right-wing Israelis view Iran as an implacable foe that controls Hezbollah, a Shi’a militant group operating in Lebanon, a border state of Israel. Thus, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Israel have all clamored to remove Iran’s influence in Syria.
This idea is incredibly naïve. Iran has been around as a regional power for a long time—in fact, for about 2,700 years. And Shia Islam is not going away. There is no way, and no reason, to “defeat” Iran. The regional powers need to forge a geopolitical equilibrium that recognizes the mutual and balancing roles of the Gulf Arabs, Turkey, and Iran. And Israeli right-wingers are naïve, and deeply ignorant of history, to regard Iran as their implacable foe, especially when that mistaken view pushes Israel to side with Sunni jihadists.
Yet Clinton did not pursue that route. Instead she joined Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and right-wing Israelis to try to isolate, even defeat, Iran. In 2010, she supported secret negotiations between Israel and Syria to attempt to wrest Syria from Iran’s influence. Those talks failed. Then the CIA and Clinton pressed successfully for Plan B: to overthrow Assad.
When the unrest of the Arab Spring broke out in early 2011, the CIA and the anti-Iran front of Israel, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey saw an opportunity to topple Assad quickly and thereby to gain a geopolitical victory. Clinton became the leading proponent of the CIA-led effort at Syrian regime change.
In early 2011, Turkey and Saudi Arabia leveraged local protests against Assad to try to foment conditions for his ouster. By the spring of 2011, the CIA and the US allies were organizing an armed insurrection against the regime. On August 18, 2011, the US Government made public its position: “Assad must go.”
Since then and until the recent fragile UN Security Council accord, the US has refused to agree to any ceasefire unless Assad is first deposed. The US policy—under Clinton and until recently—has been: regime change first, ceasefire after. After all, it’s only Syrians who are dying. Annan’s peace efforts were sunk by the United States’ unbending insistence that U.S.-led regime change must precede or at least accompany a ceasefire. As the Nation editors put it in August 2012:
The US demand that Assad be removed and sanctions be imposed before negotiations could seriously begin, along with the refusal to include Iran in the process, doomed [Annan’s] mission.
Clinton has been much more than a bit player in the Syrian crisis. Her diplomat Ambassador Christopher Stevens in Benghazi was killed as he was running a CIA operation to ship Libyan heavy weapons to Syria. Clinton herself took the lead role in organizing the so-called “Friends of Syria” to back the CIA-led insurgency.
The U.S. policy was a massive, horrific failure. Assad did not go, and was not defeated. Russia came to his support. Iran came to his support. The mercenaries sent in to overthrow him were themselves radical jihadists with their own agendas. The chaos opened the way for the Islamic State, building on disaffected Iraqi Army leaders (deposed by the US in 2003), on captured U.S. weaponry, and on the considerable backing by Saudi funds. If the truth were fully known, the multiple scandals involved would surely rival Watergate in shaking the foundations of the US establishment.
The hubris of the United States in this approach seems to know no bounds. The tactic of CIA-led regime change is so deeply enmeshed as a “normal” instrument of U.S. foreign policy that it is hardly noticed by the U.S. public or media. Overthrowing another government is against the U.N. charter and international law. But what are such niceties among friends?
This instrument of U.S. foreign policy has not only been in stark violation of international law but has also been a massive and repeated failure. Rather than a single, quick, and decisive coup d’état resolving a US foreign policy problem, each CIA-led regime change has been, almost inevitably, a prelude to a bloodbath. How could it be otherwise? Other societies don’t like their countries to be manipulated by U.S. covert operations.
Removing a leader, even if done “successfully,” doesn’t solve any underlying geopolitical problems, much less ecological, social, or economic ones. A coup d’etat invites a civil war, the kind that now wracks Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and Syria. It invites a hostile international response, such as Russia’s backing of its Syrian ally in the face of the CIA-led operations. The record of misery caused by covert CIA operations literally fills volumes at this point. What surprise, then, the Clinton acknowledges Henry Kissinger as a mentor and guide?
And where is the establishment media in this debacle? The New York Times finally covered a bit of this story last month in describing the CIA-Saudi connection, in which Saudi funds are used to pay for CIA operations in order to make an end-run around Congress and the American people. The story ran once and was dropped. Yet the Saudi funding of CIA operations is the same basic tactic used by Ronald Reagan and Oliver North in the Iran-Contra scandal of the 1980s (with Iranian arms sales used to fund CIA-led covert operations in Central America without consent or oversight by the American people).
Clinton herself has never shown the least reservation or scruples in deploying this instrument of U.S. foreign policy. Her record of avid support for US-led regime change includes (but is not limited to) the US bombing of Belgrade in 1999, the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, the Iraq War in 2003, the Honduran coup in 2009, the killing of Libya’s Muammar Qaddafi in 2011, and the CIA-coordinated insurrection against Assad from 2011 until today.
It takes great presidential leadership to resist CIA misadventures. Presidents get along by going along with arms contractors, generals, and CIA operatives. They thereby also protect themselves from political attack by hardline right-wingers. They succeed by exulting in U.S. military might, not restraining it. Many historians believe that JFK was assassinated as a result of his peace overtures to the Soviet Union, overture he made against the objections of hardline rightwing opposition in the CIA and other parts of the U.S. government.
Hillary Clinton has never shown an iota of bravery, or even of comprehension, in facing down the CIA. She has been the CIA’s relentless supporter, and has exulted in showing her toughness by supporting every one of its misguided operations. The failures, of course, are relentlessly hidden from view. Clinton is a danger to global peace. She has much to answer for regarding the disaster in Syria.
Μου αρέσει!Αρέσει σε 1 άτομο
Clinton Admits No-Fly Zone Means “Killing A Lot Of Syrians” but it’s obviously worth it
Posted on October 11, 2016 by michaellee2009
Wikileaks: Clinton Admits No-Fly Zone Means “Killing A Lot Of Syrians”
Introduction — Oct 11, 2016
Hillary Clinton. Click to enlarge
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=140845
Americans who vote for Hillary Clinton will effectively be voting for war with Russia. Putin knows that a win for Clinton in the upcoming presidential election will set the U.S. and Russia on a collision course. That’s why he has ordered a systematic build-up of Russia’s military.
A no-fly zone over Syria would need to be enforced by the U.S. and its Western allies. It would prevent Russia supporting its Syrian and Iranian allies on the ground in their fight against Western backed “rebels”, which is why Moscow would strive to prevent a no-fly zone being imposed.
Initially at least, those efforts would be diplomatic but failing that a clash between the U.S. and NATO and Russia and its allies would be almost inevitable. Make no mistake, Hillary Clinton knows this, which is why a vote for her will almost inevitably lead to war with Russia. Ed.
Wikileaks: Clinton Admits No-Fly Zone Means “Killing A Lot Of Syrians”
Kody Fairfield — The Libertarian Republic Oct 10, 2016
In the days prior to the second Presidential debate, whistle blower and hacktivist website Wikileaks dropped numerous documents allegedly obtained from Democratic Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton‘s campaign chairman John Podesta email. The emails contained comments from Clinton on voter blocs, how her campaign planned to handled different Republican candidates, various transcripts from Clinton’s Wall Street speeches, and even comments on her “public and private” policy positions.
Interestingly however was something included in a speech transcript regarding a foreign policy position which Clinton has long held, and repeated during Sunday’s second debate. That is her war-hawkish position on levying a “No-Fly Zone” over Syria as the country wades through a brutal civil war.
As reported by Russia Today (RT) in a leaked email transcript, Clinton admits that her policy position on the “No-Fly Zone” would indeed create a situation causing mass Syrian casualties.
“To have a no-fly zone you have to take out all of the air defenses, many of which are located in populated areas. So our missiles, even if they are standoff missiles so we’re not putting our pilots at risk— you’re going to kill a lot of Syrians,” Clinton admitted.
She then expressed concern that would make that “intervention that people talk about so glibly” a full-fledged “American and NATO involvement where you take a lot of civilians.”
It is interesting to look at this forethought and wonder how Clinton can still openly defend this position, especially when it can be argued that a “No-Fly Zone” would essentially be the beginning of World War III. During the Republican primary process, the Republican Senator from Kentucky, Rand Paul, laid this case out very clearly. Paul argues that attacking Russian planes which were invited to fly in that air space by the sovereign host nation, an act necessary to protecting a “No-Fly Zone,” is a “recipe for WWIII.”
Clinton, not shockingly, again appears to be in favor of war. Worse yet, this is not just war, but a war which she admits would cost “a lot” of casualties (not to say that there are wars with low casualties). Has Clinton ever met a war she did not like?
.
Source:
http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/wikileaks-clinton-email-syria/
Μου αρέσει!Μου αρέσει!
ΜΑΥΡΙΣΤΕ ΤΗΝ ΣΚΥΛΑ ΣΙΩΝΙΣΤΟΜΑΣΟΝΑ.
ΕΛΛΗΝΕΣ ΤΗΣ ΑΜΕΡΙΚΗΣ ΜΑΥΡΙΣΤΕ ΤΗΝ ΣΚΥΛΑ ΣΙΩΝΙΣΤΟΜΑΣΟΝΑ ΠΟΥ ΕΔΩ ΚΑΙ ΧΡΟΝΙΑ ΡΙΧΝΕΙ ΒΟΜΒΕΣ ΚΑΙ ΣΚΟΤΩΝΕΙ ΑΘΩΟΥΣ ΠΟΛΙΤΕΣ…ΚΑΤΙ ΠΟΥ ΕΚΑΝΕ ΚΑΙ Ο ΣΥΖΥΓΟΣ ΤΗΣ Ο ΜΙΣΟΧΑΖΟΣ ΚΑΙ ΠΑΛΑΒΟΣ ΜΠΙΛ ΚΑΙ ΜΠΙΛΙ ΤΟ ΧΑΖΟΚΑΝΤΙΛΙ.
ΨΗΦΙΣΤΕ ΤΟΝ ΝΤΟΝΑΛΤ ΤΟΝ ΓΝΗΣΙΟ ΑΜΕΡΙΚΑΝΟ ΑΛΛΑ ΝΑ ΤΟΥ ΒΑΛΕΤΕ ΚΑΙ ΤΟΝ ΟΡΟ ΝΑ ΣΤΑΜΑΤΗΣΕΙ ΑΜΕΣΩΣ ΤΟΥΣ ΒΟΜΒΑΡΔΙΣΜΟΥΣ ΚΑΙ ΝΑ ΣΥΝΕΡΓΑΣΤΕΙ ΜΑΙΖ ΜΕ ΤΟΝ ΒΛΑΔΗΜΗΡΟ ΚΑΙ ΤΗΝ ΚΙΝΑ ΚΑΙ ΤΗΝ ΓΑΤΑ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΙΚΗ ΕΝΩΣΗ ΓΙΑ ΝΑ ΕΡΘΕΙ Η ΠΡΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΗ ΕΛΕΥΘΕΡΙΑ ΣΤΗΝ ΑΝΘΡΩΟΠΟΗΤΑ ΟΛΗ ΤΗΝ ΟΠΟΙΑ ΕΔΩ ΚΑΙ ΧΡΟΝΙΑ ΔΟΛΟΦΟΝΟΥΝ ΟΙ ΔΙΕΘΝΕΙΣ ΟΒΡΙΟΜΑΣΟΝΟΙ.
ΑΝΤΙΧΡΙΣΤΟΙ ΚΑΙ ΣΑΤΑΝΑΔΕΣ ΣΤΟ ΟΝΟΜΑ ΤΩΝ ΘΕΩΝ.
ΟΙ ΑΜΕΡΙΚΑΝΟΙ ΔΕΝ ΞΕΡΟΥΝ ΓΙΑΤΙ Η ΑΝΘΡΩΠΟΤΗΤΑ ΤΟΥΣ ΜΙΣΕΙ ΚΑΙ ΤΟΥΣ ΣΥΧΕΝΕΤΑΙ…ΓΙΑΤΙ Η ΑΜΕΡΙΚΗ ΕΙΝΑΙ Ο ΜΕΓΑΛΥΤΕΡΟΣ ΠΑΓΚΟΣΜΙΟΣ ΔΟΛΟΦΟΝΟΣ ΕΔΩ ΚΑΙ ΧΡΟΝΙΑ.
ΠΡΩΤΑ ΡΙΧΝΕΙ ΒΟΜΒΕΣ ΚΑΙ ΔΟΛΟΦΟΝΕΙ ΑΘΩΟΥΣ ΚΑΙ ΜΕΤΑ ΔΙΝΕΙ ΒΟΗΘΕΙΑ ΝΑ ΦΑΝΕ ΟΙ ΜΙΣΟΠΕΘΑΜΕΝΟΙ.
ΠΙΝΕΙ ΤΟ ΑΙΜΑ ΤΗΣ ΑΝΘΡΩΠΟΤΗΤΑΣ….ΔΟΛΟΦΟΝΕΙ….ΝΕΟΥΣ ΚΑΙ ΓΕΡΟΥΣ ΚΑΙ ΓΡΙΕΣ ΑΛΛΛΑ ΚΑΙ ΝΕΟΓΕΝΝΗΤΑ ΠΑΙΔΙΑΚΙΑ ΤΑ ΟΠΟΙΑ ΜΙΑ ΜΕΡΑ ΘΑ ΑΝΤΙΔΡΑΣΟΥΝ ΚΑΙ ΟΥΕ ΚΑΙ ΑΛΛΟΙΜΟΝΟ ΑΝ ΚΑΠΟΙ ΜΕΡΑ ΒΓΕΙ Η ΑΤΟΜΙΚΗ ΒΟΜΒΑ ΤΣΕΠΗΣ…Η ΑΜΕΡΙΚΗ ΑΠΟ ΤΟΝ ΧΑΡΤΗ ΘΑ ΕΞΑΦΑΝΙΣΤΕΙ ΑΝ ΔΕΝ ΑΛΛΑΞΕΙ ΤΑΚΤΙΚΗ.
ΑΣ ΠΑΕΙ ΣΤΗΝ ΒΟΡΕΙΟ ΚΟΡΕΑ ΝΑ ΡΙΞΕΙ ΒΟΜΒΕΣ ΣΤΟΝ ΧΟΝΤΡΟ ΕΚΕΙ ΑΡΧΗΓΟ ΚΑΙ ΑΠΟΓΟΝΟ ΤΩΝ ΜΑΡΞΙΣΤΩΝ ΤΩΝ ΛΥΚΩΝ ΜΠΟΛΣΕΒΙΚΩΝ.
Η ΑΜΕΡΙΚΗ ΠΡΕΠΕΙ ΝΑ ΑΛΛΑΞΕΙ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗ.
ΣΗΜΕΡΑ Ο ΜΙΣΟΣ ΑΜΕΡΙΚΑΝΙΚΟΣ ΛΑΟΣ ΠΕΙΝΑΕΙ ΚΑΙ ΣΤΑ ΠΑΡΚΑ ΖΗΤΙΑΝΟΣ ΓΥΡΝΑΕΙ ΚΑΙ ΑΠΟ ΜΕΡΙΑ ΟΙ ΚΑΠΙΤΑΛΙΣΤΕΣ ΛΙΣΤΕΣ ΤΑ ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΟΥΝ ΚΑΙ ΣΤΑ ΔΙΕΘΝΗ ΜΠΟΥΔΕΛΛΑ ΤΑ ΣΚΟΡΠΟΥΝ.
ΤΟΥΤΑ ΤΑ ΛΟΓΙΑ ΛΕΓΩ ΕΓΩ ΕΝΑ ΘΥΜΑ ΤΩΝ ΛΥΚΩΝ ΜΠΟΛΣΕΒΙΚΩΝ ΑΛΛΑ ΕΔΩ ΚΑΙ ΧΡΟΝΙΑ ΚΑΙ ΕΙΔΙΚΑ ΜΕΤΑ ΤΟ 1999 ΜΕ ΤΗΝ ΒΑΡΒΑΡΗ ΕΠΙΔΡΟΜΗ ΣΤΗΝ ΤΟΤΕ ΓΙΟΥΓΚΟΣΛΑΒΙΑ ΤΟΥΣ ΕΓΡΑΨΑ ΣΤΑ ΤΡΙΑ.
ΕΠΙΔΡΟΜΗ ΒΑΡΒΑΡΗ ΣΤΟ ΙΡΑΚ… ΣΤΗΝ ΛΙΒΥΗ ΚΑΙ ΤΩΡΑ ΣΥΡΙΑ…ΣΤΟ ΤΕΛΟΣ ΘΑ ΠΑΡΕΤΕ ΤΑ ΤΡΙΑ….ΓΙΑΤΙ ΟΤΙ ΕΧΕΙ ΑΡΧΗ ΕΧΕΙ ΚΑΙ ΤΕΛΟΣ.
ΡΙΞΤΕ ΕΞΩ ΑΠΟ ΤΟΝ ΛΕΥΚΟ ΠΥΡΓΟ ΤΗΣ ΟΥΑΣΙΓΚΤΩΝ ΤΗΝ ΤΡΙΜΕΛΗ ΣΙΩΝΙΣΤΟ ΟΒΡΑΙΟΜΑΣΟΝΙΚΗ ΕΠΙΤΡΟΠΗ ΠΟΥ ΔΙΝΕΙ ΕΝΤΟΛΕΣ ΣΤΟΝ ΚΑΘΕ ΠΡΟΕΔΡΟ ΤΗΣ ΑΜΕΡΙΚΗΣ…ΕΝΤΟΛΕΣ ΤΟΥ ΑΝΤΙΧΡΙΣΤΟΥ 666…Ο ΟΠΟΙΟΣ ΚΑΤΟΙΚΕΙ ΣΤΗΝ ΑΜΕΡΙΚΗ..
ΠΡΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟΙ ΓΝΗΣΟΙ ΑΜΕΡΙΚΑΝΟΙ ΗΤΑΝ ΚΑΙ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΟΙ ΓΝΗΣΙΟΙ ΙΝΔΙΑΝΟΙ.
ΕΓΩ ΕΙΜΑΙ ΕΝΑΣ ΑΓΡΙΟΣ ΙΝΔΙΑΝΟΣ ΚΑΙ ΔΕΝ ΚΑΤΑΛΑΒΑΙΝΩ ΕΣΑΣ ΤΟΥ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΣΜΕΝΟΥΣ ΤΗΣ ΔΥΣΗΣ….ΕΙΠΕ ΚΑΠΟΤΕ ΕΝΑΣ ΙΝΔΙΑΝΟΣ ΤΟΝ ΟΠΟΙΟ ΤΙΜΩ ΚΑΙ ΔΙΝΩ ΤΟ ΧΕΡΙ ΜΟΥ.ΑΝ ΟΙ ΙΝΔΙΑΝΟΙ ΚΕΡΔΙΖΑΕ ΤΟΝ ΠΟΛΕΜΟ ΜΕ ΤΟΥΣ ΤΟΤΕ ΠΑΓΚΟΣΜΙΟΥΣ ΕΓΚΛΗΜΑΤΙΕΣ ΚΑΙ ΑΠΟΜΕΙΝΑΡΙΑ ΤΩΝ ΝΑΖΙΣΤΩΝ ΚΑΙ ΦΑΣΙΣΤΩΝ ΚΑΙ ΜΑΡΞΙΣΤΩΝ ΤΑ ΠΡΑΓΜΑΤΑ ΘΑ ΗΤΑΝ ΔΙΑΦΟΡΕΤΙΚΑ ΑΛΛΑ ΕΓΩ ΛΕΩ ΠΟΤΕ ΔΕΝ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΑΡΓΑ.
ΕΛΛΗΝΕΣ ΤΗΣ ΑΜΕΡΙΚΗΣ ΜΑΥΡΙΣΤΕ ΤΗΝ ΣΚΥΛΑ ΟΒΡΙΑΟΜΑΣΟΝΑ ΚΑΙ ΔΟΛΟΦΟ ΝΟ ΤΗΣ ΑΝΘΡΩΠΟΤΗΤΑΣ ΚΑΙ ΑΝΘΕΛΛΗΝΙΔΑ ΑΓΡΙΑ ΜΑΓΙΣΣΑ.
Ο ΝΤΟΝΑΛΤ ΠΡΕΠΕΙ ΝΑ ΓΙΝΕΙ ΘΕΟΣ ΤΗΣ ΑΜΕΡΙΚΗΣ…ΚΑΙ ΝΑ ΣΥΝΕΡΓΑΣΤΕΙ ΜΕ ΤΟΝ ΘΕΟ ΤΗΣ ΕΥΡΩΠΗΣ ΤΟΝ ΒΛΑΔΗΜΗΡΟ.
ΔΥΟ ΘΕΟΙ ΜΑΖΙ ΑΡΚΟΥΝ Σ ΑΥΤΗΝ ΤΗΝ ΓΗ.
ΝΤΟΝΑΛΤ ΑΚΟΥΣΕ ΤΟΝ ΘΑΝΑΣΗ.ΠΡΙΝ ΒΓΕΙ ΒΟΜΒΑ ΑΤΟΜΙΚΗ ΤΣΕΠΗΣ.
ΘΑΝΑΣΗΣ ΘΥΜΙΟΠΟΥΛΟΣ.
Ο ΞΕΝΙΤΕΜΕΝΟΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΑΣ.
ΔΙΑΔΙΔΕΤΕ ΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗ ΣΚΕΨΗ.
Μου αρέσει!Μου αρέσει!